Mastodon vs. Bluesky — should we compare?

DALLE 3

Summarizing previous posts in a final one. Some changes are there, let’s see it alltogether:

 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Component                                        | Bluesky  | Mastodon  |
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Content Preview                                  |   ✅     |    ✅    |
| Open Source License                              |   ✅     |    ✅    |
| Registered users                                 |   24m    |    15m    |
| Can register                                     |   ✅     |    ✅    |
| Easy sharing API *                               |   🚫     |    ✅    |
| Light / dark theme                               |   ✅     |    ✅    |
| Users lists                                      |   ✅     |    ✅    |
| Editing posts                                    |   🚫     |    ✅    |
| Android app                                      |   ✅     |    ✅    |
| Post length                                      |   300ch  |   500ch   |
| Working OG metas                                 |   🚫     |    ✅    |
| Full device sharing capabilities **              |   🚫     |    ✅    |
| Grown up UI ***                                  |   🚫     |    ✅    |
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------

* = desktop browser support is okay: 
    'Share to Mastodon' & 'Bluesky Share Extension'

** = Android sharing capabilities are limited on Bluesky

*** = Having multpile #UI #UX issues on Bluesky

Share to Mastodon & Bluesky Share Extension in the browser

Elk Mastodon PWA & Bluesky PWA on the taskbar

Actually 24m vs 14m user could be the key in the past months. Even if there are lots of organized cool feature in Mastodon. Historically. It’s much more sophisticated, as the comparision also shows. Plus Mastodon and Bluesky user base are much different. That’s all.